Extra Fields in Trackback Spam

One of my blogs just caught a spammer from 69.31.80.66 trying to submit trackbacks to the blog, with extra fields in the “Name” field.

Gen Drebery’,’deber@gmail.com’,”,’63.2.12.45′,’2008-01-25 13:43:30′,’2008-01-25 13:43:30′,”,’0′,’Internet Explorer’,’comment’,’0′,’0′),(’0′, ”, ”, ”, ”, ‘2008-01-26 13:43:30′, ‘2008-01-26 13:43:30′, ”, ’spam’, ”, ‘comment’, ‘0′,’0′ ) /*

The web server logs showed he was trying to hit a specific post, then tried to hit the first post. Could this be an attempt to fingerprint my blog?

69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:28 -0500] “POST /2006/10/30/post-slug-here/wp-trackback.php HTTP/1.0″ 404 19104 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:28 -0500] “POST /2006/10/30/wp-trackback.php HTTP/1.0″ 404 19123 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:28 -0500] “POST /2006/10/wp-trackback.php HTTP/1.0″ 404 19104 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:29 -0500] “POST /2006/wp-trackback.php HTTP/1.0″ 404 19104 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:29 -0500] “POST /wp-trackback.php HTTP/1.0″ 200 135 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:29 -0500] “GET /wp-trackback.php?p=1 HTTP/1.0″ 302 - “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:30 -0500] “GET /wp-login.php?action=logout HTTP/1.0″ 302 - “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:30 -0500] “POST /wp-trackback.php?p=1 HTTP/1.0″ 200 78 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:31 -0500] “POST /wp-trackback.php?p=1 HTTP/1.0″ 500 600 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″
69.31.80.66 - - [25/Jan/2008:08:43:31 -0500] “POST /wp-trackback.php?p=1 HTTP/1.0″ 500 600 “-” “Python-urllib/1.17″

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. This allows you to read my newer articles without having to visit the site again. Thanks for visiting! Mike

Posted under Spam

This post was written by Michael Clark on January 25, 2008

3 Comments so far

  1. Johann Burkard February 9, 2008 2:18 pm

    I would strongly suggest that you block user agents containing urllib and other HTTP libraries.

  2. Michael Clark February 9, 2008 2:39 pm

    I’m getting to the point of getting a lot more aggressive in blocking. I do use wget and other command line functions on my own sites though, so I need to create my own user-agent for when I use those tools. You have a lot of great info on your site Johann.

  3. Johann February 9, 2008 2:54 pm

    Thanks Mike. I don’t see much abuse coming from wget and I use it myself for backup purposes.

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments

More Blog Post