Slashdot, news for nerds. Maybe the original blogging site, technical article summaries from around the world, with commentary from the technical elite (aka nerds).

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. This allows you to read my newer articles without having to visit the site again. Thanks for visiting! Mike

The new iMacs with the embedded iSight camera also have a nifty piece of software called Front Row. It allows easy access to audio, video, movies, and photos. To make it work on other Macs, check out How To Install Apple’s Front Row.

My gmail test account is filling up. 2,655 messages are in my Inbox; with 35,536 in my Spambox. Gmail left 6.95% of incoming messages in the Inbox. All messages coming into my account are spam from a dead domain created years ago.

I forwarded mail from my spam-collection domain to new accounts at Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail. Yahoo and Hotmail didn’t allow any spam at all to get into the Inbox. Of course, Hotmail had an easier time since they only accepted 926 messages, while Yahoo accepted 4,149. Gmail accepted 3,068, allowing 224 (7.30%) into the Inbox. So maybe Yahoo’s Mail is the webmail system to use. They aren’t flat out dropping as many messages as Gmail, or as Hotmail. It would be really ncie to know what criteria Hotmail and Gmail (and maybe even Yahoo) are using to decide which messages to drop. Is it a blacklist based on message headers? Or based on links in the body? Content analysis (ala spamAssassin)?

Once I noticed that the webmail companies were dropping some mail I stopped the forwarding. Ideally, I should download the mail to my Mac so I can see which messges were dropped. Anyone know a way to easily look for duplicate messages? If I add a X-trace-tag header when the message leaves my doamin, would that invalidate the header trail?

Derik suggested a comparison between Gmail, Hotmail, and Yahoo mail. Glad to oblige. Last night I set up virgin email accounts at each service. Then I redirected all mail from my spam ridden domain to each address. It’s been a looong time since I’ve used Yahoo or Hotmail, so I figured it would be interesting to see how they are.

Yahoo

Signing up is pretty straightforward. Make sure you opt out of the thirteen “Special Offers and Marketing Communications” from Yahoo!. Even if you do, you may get them for up to 10 days.

Also make sure you read all of the 126 lines in the Terms of Service. I love how every onilne service makes it easy to sign up, but difficult to read the terms of service.

Yahoo gave me 1.0GB of space for messages. This morning they have caught 3,419 pieces of spam, with nothing in my inbox. Not bad. I also counted six graphical ads, including an enormous one that takes half the screen.

Hotmail

Signing up was not too bad. you only get 25 MB of space, and then up to 250Mb in around 30 days after someone at Hotmail decides you are worthy. I found the home page very busy. There are tons of links to go other places, a large ad (but not as large as Yahoo’s big ad).

It was very confusing when I tried to logout. Apparently, Hotmail does not want you to log out. I never was able to successfully log out. If you hit the “Need help signing out?” link, all you get a is a pitch for other MS services, like Passport. I’m still not sure if I got logged out or not. Wonderful, is MS tracking me as I surf?

This morning, they’ve caught 898 messages, none missed. but where are the other couple thousand messages? I see tons fo rejections in my mail server’s log. It makes me wonder how robust Hotmail is and how many other messages didn’t make it to my Hotmail mailbox at all.

I will say it was cool to see that Hotmail is still linking to GetNetWise in the page footer. GetNetWise is one of the web sites I manage for my day job.

Gmail

Gmail is interesting, because you have to either be referred by a friend (I have over a hundred invitations if anyone is interested), or you have to provide Gmail with your cell number so they can SMS you a code to sign up. So you can’t be totally anonymous through Gmail. So even though Gmail appears to be the only large webmail provider protecting user’s privacy from the government, they do know a lot about you. Currently, they give users 2.6GB of space.

Gmail has the cleanest interface by far. The ads appear as text blocks once you are actually looking at a message.

Gmail missed 184 messages, and tagged 2,591 messages. So it looks like Gmail is missing some messages too. Weird. All three of these services should have the same number of messages total.

Terms of Service

Remember the good old days, when there was a separate page you had to click through that had the entire terms of service available without having to scroll through a one inch high textbox? It seems the service provider would love to have a captive audience so teey could have another opportunity for a few eyeballs to see an ad. Plus now you have to read two or three separate agreements to sign up for a service. Who really reads these things?

Summary

Wow, I think I’ll stay with my home grown solution: SquirrelMail running on my Red Hat Enterprise box. If I had to recommend a webmail system to someone, I’d lean towards Gmail. It’s clean interface, generous disk space make it a winner. But I wouldn’t run a business off of it.

After 1 day, 18 hours, Gmail has correctly tagged 9,819 messages as spam; and allowed 527 pieces into my Inbox. That is a 5.1% error rate. I’m also using 66Mb (2%) of my 2,686 Mb of storage space.

After only 18 hours, Gmail has caught 3,930 messages and let through 267 messages. That is allowing about 6% of the spam through.

I have redirected email from a domain that gets nothing but 3,000+ pieces of spam a day to a new Gmail.com account. In the first 5 minutes, Gmail is batting 23 for 25. That is, it correctly identified 23 pieces of spam as spam, and incorrectly identified 2 pieces of spam as ham (not spam). That’s an 8 per cent error rate. We’ll see how it evolves over time.

An interesting article, detailing lots of information about using CSS to format typefaces used on web sites: CSS Typography.

I just tried to renew some domains at Network Solutions (for work, not for me) using Firefox 1.5 under OS X. All I get after logging in and making a selection is a blank screen. Great.